RESUMO
A matching-to-sample task with a 3-sample, 2-comparison mapping has been found to engender joint control by the stimuli that signaled the samples (keylight) and the inter-trial interval (houselight), with a trade-off in the degree of control exerted by each stimulus. To learn about the boundary conditions for the establishment of that joint stimulus control, we trained pigeons in a similar task, but featuring a one-to-one sample-comparison mapping, with two samples and two comparisons. To assess their relative influences, we ran two tests where each of the stimuli was removed: in one test, no sample keylight was presented, and in the other, the ITI was spent in darkness. Results were consistent with both stimuli influencing choice but there was no clear evidence of a trade-off between them. These results suggest that sample-comparison mapping and/or total number of samples may influence how an animal directs its attention to the stimuli available.
